Covid19 Lockdown – A Chance to Practice

So, I have always been of the impression that “I can’t” paint portraits. In fact, I “can’t” even draw faces that look anything like my subject.

Well, while I’m on lockdown I decided to give it a try and practice until I can. Admittedly I used a photo for reference for my first go.

It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child.

Pablo Picasso

Updated: Assignment 3

Read Plato’s account of the Allegory of the Cave and say whether and why you think it is valid today.

There are various ways you can answer this question. In what sense might we be ‘in the dark’ about the world we live in? Are we in some sense collectively manipulated or do we just think we are? Does Plate’s image of shadows on a cave wall bear comparison with the technicological screen? Try to provide sufficient evidence in your answer and take relevant quote from the text.

I have updated my assignment based on my tutorial. I really enjoyed discussing the essay with my Tutor and understanding areas that my work might be improved. I have re-worked the essay to include more in my word-count which is relevant to my argument, rather than recounting the piece from the question. I have included some footnotes, which should cover areas when I might otherwise veer off-topic.

Is this story relevant today? In short, I believe it is.


In today’s world, “the dark” or “the cave” could refer to many different things. The first thing that comes to mind for me is the idea of being “in the dark” regarding education or information. Perhaps that is indicative of the world we live in today, which is quite information/data based. We live in an “information age”, however not everyone has equal access to this information or to education which would allow them to understand it. The “coming into the light” could be the process of education, which is denied to millions of people around the world, particularly women and girls. In fact, “67 million primary-school-age children are still denied the right to education” (ACEI-Global, 2014) . Of those people who are denied their education, they may be aware of this denial – in which case they are aware that there is a world outside their cave, but they are unable to access it – or they are unaware that this education exists – in which case “they have been from their childhood, and have their legs and necks chained so that they cannot move, and can only see before them, being prevented by the chains from turning round their heads” (Webspace.ship.edu, 2019) [1]

The danger in either situation, is that the reality that they experience is being controlled by another force, and therefore ” they see only their own shadows, or the shadows of one another, which the fire throws on the opposite wall of the cave” (Webspace.ship.edu, 2019). When the information and education that you have access to is controlled by another person or administration, it can lead to the development of a very narrow point of view, a duplication of the administrations opinions, which you might consider your own, however you simply do not know any better at the time. I feel that this can lead to a fear of the unknown, a fear of The Other – other peoples, other cultures – and fear often leads to defensive actions or aggression; as one author put it “Fear and loathing of the unknown “other” fuels hatred—the underlying emotional driver of radical ideologies such as jihadism, white supremacy, and fascism.” (Goni, 2017). Our world today seems to be dominated by Terrorism – in which one culture of people attacks another because of differing beliefs or unequal resources, radical thinking .

I think that the Allegory of the Cave addresses this, in its description of men returning from the outside world to discuss the “truth” with those who know nothing of this world: “Men would say of him that up he went and down he came without his eyes; and that it was better not even to think of ascending; and if anyone tried to lose another and lead him up to the light, let them only catch the offender, and they would put him to death”. Is the “truth” not simply what one is presented with by an Administration of sorts, designed to accomplish some need of that Administration – for example, religious extremists who will convince others that they must defend their religion against the West – The Other – they are being presented with a “truth” which may only be true when considered from one point of view – how can they tell the difference? [2] How could the man, released from the cave, have decided that the world above was “Real” and the world below was not? It’s a very interesting concept, and one that I think needs more in-depth discussion than this essay can allow.

Another way that I believe we are being ‘kept in the dark’ – collectively – is through politics and social media. Social media – any media, actually – is essentially owned by someone. Therefore, the information that we received in our media and news, is filtered through that someone’s point of view, political affiliations, financial obligations. Each society has their own Government. It is that Government who determine what access we have to what information, whether we like to believe that or not. In that way, they are like the marionettes who project images onto our cave wall. Our Government is the body whom we have assigned to inform us of what is true and what is not, and, in some ways, we have no power to be informed otherwise; for an extreme example, in Dictatorships like North Korea. “All media outlets are owned and controlled by the North Korean government. As such, all media in North Korea get their news from the Korean Central News Agency. The media dedicate a large portion of their resources toward political propaganda and promoting the personality cult of Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-Il and Kim Jong-un. The government of Kim Jong-un still has absolute authority over and control of the press and information.” (En.wikipedia.org, 2019).

This reminds me of the line in the Allegory “How could they see anything but the shadows if they were never allowed to move their heads?”. When the Government of a country becomes involved or responsible for the information that we have access to, it would be reasonable to say that we are all being collectively manipulated.

The most obvious comparison to today’s world is the comparison of the cave wall with our Screens; “According to the market-research group Nielsen, adults spend over 11 hours per day interacting with media.” (Brooks, 2018) (remembering, that this media is controlled). Screens offer us a whole new “reality” in which to exist; not only is there the opportunity to create avatars and live in artificial worlds and communities, but there are Social medias which allow us to share only what we want to share with others, to create new “selves” and to experience the world in different ways. We have access to seemingly unlimited information. However, what we seem to forget is that this is all virtual. What we see and experience and feel via our screens in in fact just projections of the “real” world outside of technology. Watching a video on animals in the Amazon, for example, is not the same as visiting the Amazon in person and experiencing this in real life.

What we experience through technology is simply “a mediated and low-resolution approximation of life” (Taylor, 2011) which can become addictive the same way drugs or sex can become addictive, as discussed in Psychology Today article on Technology: Virtual VS Real life” (Taylor, 2019). This makes me think of the people within the cave who congratulate themselves on their skill at identifying the shadows that they see, creating an exciting challenge for themselves in this very limited world; “conferring honors among themselves on those who were quickest to observe the passing shadows and to remark which of them went before, and which followed after, and which were together; and who were therefore best able to draw conclusions as to the future”.

It would be quite easy to imagine that the Allegory of the Cave was written during our modern times, rather than during 500a. It is very relevant to life today.

Footnotes:

[1] Education can help to alleviate poverty in the next generation, as well as develop communities and learn how to fight disease. Generally in developing countries, education of girls and women is not encouraged, which slows the progress of the community as a whole. See https://acei-global.blog/2014/03/06/15-facts-on-education-in-developing-countries/

[2] The use of the “other” is quite often employed by Governments, administrations, political or religious parties in order to unite their own followers against “something” or “someones”. For example, a Government whose followers are beginning to fragment, might be presented with a “Common Enemy” or “Other” against whom they must unite in order to protect themselves. It is an interesting idea in terms of art and history, propaganda, feminist art, religious art intended to inform and warn people, art used to declare wealth and status etc.

REFERENCES

ACEI-Global. (2014). 15 Facts on Education in Developing Countries. [online] Available at: https://acei-global.blog/2014/03/06/15-facts-on-education-in-developing-countries/ [Accessed 3 Aug. 2019].

Brooks, M. (2018). How Much Screen Time Is Too Much? [online] Psychology Today. Available at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/tech-happy-life/201812/how-much-screen-time-is-too-much [Accessed 3 Aug. 2019].

En.wikipedia.org. (2019). Censorship in North Korea. [online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_North_Korea [Accessed 3 Aug. 2019].

Goni, C. (2017). The Way to Combat Online Radicalization Is Actually Offline. [online] Opensocietyfoundations.org. Available at: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/truth-about-terror-and-youth-radicalization [Accessed 3 Aug. 2019].

Taylor, J. (2011). Technology: Virtual vs. Real Life: You Choose. [online] Psychology Today. Available at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-power-prime/201105/technology-virtual-vs-real-life-you-choose [Accessed 3 Aug. 2019].

Webspace.ship.edu. (2019). Plato’s Cave. [online] Available at: http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/platoscave.html [Accessed 15 Sep. 2019].

work in progress

I normally paint fast. Oil paint with a palette knife, just painting what I feel at that moment.

previous seascape, oil on canvas

Right now, I’m trying to calm my mind, focus on a scene that I want to emulate by an artist I recently discovered called Ivan Aivazovsky

I’m working slowly -over two days so far which is a massive change for me.

We will see how it turns out!

Here it is as of now.

day two

What I like about his work is the transparency of the sea, so that’s what I’m looking for.

Ivan Aivazovsky ship on a stormy sea

Cornelia Parker – Daily Notes

I came across an article about Cornelia Parker’s “Exploded shed” works and I found it so intriguing.

Cold Dark Matter: An Exploded View 1991 Cornelia Parker born 1956 Presented by the Patrons of New Art (Special Purchase Fund) through the Tate Gallery Foundation 1995 http://www.tate.org.uk/art/work/T06949

The concept behind the piece is described by the artist as creating a lasting version of an instantaneous event (an explosion), which is something that we are constantly exposed to in our lives, but using a mundane yet sentimentally important area of our lives, the garden shed. Parker’s comments on sheds are quite romantic; as the place to store items that are no longer of use, but which one simply cannot throw away.

For the creation of this piece, she had a shed constructed specifically to be blown up. While she could have used a “found” shed, she felt that it would be much too personal to blow us “someone’s” shed. She then filled it with various bits and bobs, from car boot sales and some items of her own. Then, she simply blew it up!

One part of this that I found particularly interesting is her involvement of the army in creating the explosion. I think I found it surprising because I always feel that work – including installation work – is really the artists creation alone, and the idea that other people (especially people who are not artistically involved) would be involved surprised me. I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised, having recently discussed House in a course exercise.

The finished piece is so wonderful to look at. The shapes, the shadows, the suspended feeling, the feeling that at any moment it should resume it’s force and come towards the observer. I would love to see it up close, the view what is left on the inside of the wooden pieces, what survived the wreckage. It also makes me think of death, of returning to some atomic level of being, the light shining from within. I find it quite comforting.

Part Three – Self Assessment

Understanding Visual Culture:  Assessment Criteria:  Part Four

Demonstration of subject based knowledge and understanding

I feel I presented my work a bit better this module; I had been having difficulty with structuring my exercises and being coherent in my arguements. I feel I demonstrated my understanding much better this time around. I work very hard on it. I still feel I am lacking a bit of subject knowledge especially around philosophical ideas, but that can only come with more exposure to the subject.

Demonstration of research skills

I tried to incorporate Referencing into all of my exercises as well as my assignment in Module 3. I found that a lot of my references are secondary, but I think that comes with the territory of Art History in general, as a lot of it is theory based on historical works.

Demonstration of critical and evaluation skills

I need to work on coming up with a coherent conclusion to my arguements. While I find it quite easy to argue two different sides of a theory, I find it difficult to settle on one at the end. One of the exercises in Part three required a conclusion paragraph, which I found difficult.

Communication

I have not kept up with my daily notes or creating work during part three, for various reasons. I found this section extremely difficult, whether it was my own mental block to the subject matter or just a lack of energy to apply to it, I’m not sure. I was ill for several weeks and during that time I didn’t have any energy to create anything. I did, however, relocate my studio to a larger room in my house and organised thinsg properly, so I hope to do some more “making” this weekend as I launch into Part 4.

Tutor Feedback – Assignment Two (Pre-tutorial)

I have (thankfully) passed Assignment two.

I have received my written feedback from my tutor, in an annotated version of my assignment (here) and a feedback form (here).

I felt that I struggled with this assignment. I had difficulty coming across an explanation (that I could understand) for Modern VS Modernist VS Modernism etc. However, I tried my best and did as much research on the terminology as I could. My tutor has suggested a book of key terms called “Keywords” by Raymond Williams, which I am going to try to source if I can. I hope it will help to clarify things a little for me.

There were two errors pointed out to me by my tutor which I was surprised to see, only to find out that they were IT errors on my part; One was referencing the wrong name in-text. The author is Enright, R., which I correctly entered in my Bibliography, but in-text I referenced “Robert, E.”. This has brought my attention to my inability to correctly proofread my own work. I might try to ask my family to proofread after I have written in the future. My tutor pointed out that I had re-stated the same point twice in my assignment, which again points to proofreading. I hope to resolve this in time for my next assignment.

The second error was related to my Blog, where my Category posts were not showing under my Category tab on my blog, and therefore it looked like my Research & Reflection category was empty, when it in fact was not. This has been resolved, after contacting WordPress for help.

I will be speaking with my tutor next week for verbal feedback, and I hope to clarify whether or not I should re-write Assignment Two based on the feedback. I am hoping to pass External Assessment at the end of the year, but I am feeling quite anxious about it at the moment.

After death

I came across an interesting article this morning on artnet about an exhibition of personal photographs which were found posthumously.

The photographer had been a commercial photographer, described as quiet and “average”. The photographs were found to contain personal images of the photographer identifying as a woman, whom he called April Dawn Allison.

What was interesting to me about the article was the question “should we be looking?”. Although the author doesn’t explain how the photos came in t o the possession of this curator, it feels almost inappropriate to me. Not, obviously, the content or the skill demonstrated in the photographs themselves but because of the concerted effort at keeping them private by the photographer himself. They were captured on Polaroid to avoid external processing, he apparently didn’t introduce April to friends or colleagues, no-one else appears in the photos. They are extremely powerful to look at and definitely speak to us as observers, with very strong emotions; but that emotional connection between photographer and subject – in this case – was not intended to be seen.

It’s interesting to me that this question is raised, stated, displayed as the museum nevertheless holds the exhibition and it reminds me of my recent feelings about over analysis in art studies. Do we as artists lose all right to privacy when we choose to display one area of our lives? When does the choice end – is it after death? Are contemporary artists forced to share more than their work, share part of their lives and inner thoughts in order to be “seen”; especially in the age of social media?

The article is here if you want to read it. I would love to hear your thoughts, if you feel like commenting below.